In Sample paper one, i felt like throughout the whole paper had some sort of summary in every paragraph by quoting a particular part of the book then summarizes that quote in what happened in the book. It kind of got repetitive and i lost interest in reading the whole thing.
In sample paper #2 i felt was a lot better because he did a good way of making their point and using their paragraphs to support what he/she was trying to get through to the reader. In this paragraph the person analyzed what went through arnold as he was living through these times and connected it to us as readers. For example he would say that Arnold would never ignore his problems and compared it to many people in the world in saying that it is hard for people to not ignore their problems. I felt like this sampling paper worked very well because of the fluidness in his paragraphs, not only that he compared and contrast many things in the book which made me think more as i read.
In sample paper number 3 i felt it was very similar to number one in terms of quoting the book before summarizing what had happened, but in paper 3 the person who wrote it analyzed the paper more and tried to make sense of it all rather then just summarizing. Another problem is that i felt like this paper had no clear thesis as paper 1, he or she may have hinted it, but i still question the clear cut thesis he/she is trying to put out in this paper.
No comments:
Post a Comment